Andrew Whallon, Dahlia Garcia and Richard Grayshaw v. City of Houston

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 30, 2013·No. 01-11-00333-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-11-00333-CV Style: Andrew Whallon, Dahlia Garcia, and Richard Grayshaw v City of Houston Date motion filed*: August 15, 2013 Type of motion: Motion to Exceed Word Count Limit for Briefs Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ We STRIKE appellants’ briefs for failure to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i)(2)(B) and ORDER appellants to file briefs complying with the rule within 30 days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(2), (3), (j). No extensions of time to file appellants’ briefs will be granted. If appellants’ amended briefs are not filed by the deadline, the Court will dismiss this appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), (c). Appellee’s brief will be due 30 days after appellants file briefs in compliance with rule 9.4(i)(2).

Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack  Acting

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: September 30, 2013

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrew Whallon, Dahlia Garcia and Richard Grayshaw v. City of Houston, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Andrew Whallon, Dahlia Garcia and Richard Grayshaw v. City of Houston (Andrew Whallon, Dahlia Garcia and Richard Grayshaw v. City of Houston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.