Andrew Teter v. Anne E. Lopez
This text of 93 F.4th 1150 (Andrew Teter v. Anne E. Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 22 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANDREW TETER; JAMES GRELL, No. 20-15948
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 1:19-cv-00183-ACK-WRP v. District of Hawaii, Honolulu ANNE E. LOPEZ; DARRYL NG, ORDER Defendants-Appellees.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.
Judges Owens and Bennett did not participate in the deliberations or vote in
this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 F.4th 1150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrew-teter-v-anne-e-lopez-ca9-2024.