Andrew Teter v. Anne E. Lopez

93 F.4th 1150
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 22, 2024·No. 20-15948·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 22 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREW TETER; JAMES GRELL, No. 20-15948

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No.

1:19-cv-00183-ACK-WRP

v. District of Hawaii, Honolulu

ANNE E. LOPEZ; DARRYL NG, ORDER

Defendants-Appellees.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Judges Owens and Bennett did not participate in the deliberations or vote in

this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrew Teter v. Anne E. Lopez, 93 F.4th 1150 (9th Cir. 2024).

93 F.4th 1150 (Andrew Teter v. Anne E. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Andrew Teter v. Anne E. Lopez
125 F.4th 1301 (Ninth Circuit, 2025)