Andrew Taylor v. Ronald Davis
This text of 607 F. App'x 298 (Andrew Taylor v. Ronald Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ronald Jefferson Davis, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and upholding the bankruptcy court’s determination that the debt he owes to Andrew and Naomi Taylor is non-disehargeable in his bankruptcy case. On appeal, Davis argues only that the Taylors failed to timely file the certificate of service for the amended complaint and that the bankruptcy court erred by denying his motion to strike the amended complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration of that order. We grant the Taylors’ motion to supplement the record. Upon review of the record, as supplemented, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Taylor v. Davis, No. 2:13-cv-02717-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
607 F. App'x 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrew-taylor-v-ronald-davis-ca4-2015.