Andrew Shalaby v. Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Andrew Shalaby v. Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 379 F. App'x 620
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 19, 2010·No. 09-56331·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 19 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREW W. SHALABY; SONIA No. 09-56331 DUNN-RUIZ, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-02107-MMA- Plaintiffs - Appellants, BLM

v. ORDER NEWELL RUBBERMAID, INC.; THE HOME DEPOT, INC.; IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY, INC.; BERNZOMATIC,

Defendants-cross-claimants - Appellees,

and

WESTERN INDUSTRIES, INC.; WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES,

Cross-defendants - Appellees,

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Michael M. Anello, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 7, 2010 Pasadena, California

Before: FRIEDMAN,* D.W. NELSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

This memorandum disposition, filed on May 17, 2010, is amended as

follows:

(1) The citation found on page 3, lines 8–9, should instead read as follows:

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 589, 592–93 (1993).

(2) The citation found on page 5, line 3, should instead read as follows:

Stephen, 134 Cal. App. 4th at 1373.

* The Honorable Daniel M. Friedman, United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrew Shalaby v. Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., (9th Cir. 2010).

Andrew Shalaby v. Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. (Andrew Shalaby v. Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 (Supreme Court, 1993)