Andrew Samuel v. South Port II Apartments
This text of Andrew Samuel v. South Port II Apartments (Andrew Samuel v. South Port II Apartments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 5, 2014.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00511-CV
ANDREW SAMUEL, Appellant V. SOUTH PORT II APARTMENTS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-01310-B
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. In a letter dated July 2, 2014, we notified
appellant that the Dallas County Clerk informed the Court that the clerk’s record had not been
filed because appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We
directed appellant to file, within ten days of the date of our letter, written verification that he had
paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We cautioned appellant that if we did
not receive the required documentation within ten days, we might dismiss the appeal without
further notice. To date, appellant has not provided the required documentation regarding the
status of the clerk’s record nor has he otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding this
appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b),
42.3(b), (c).
/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
140511F.P05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
ANDREW SAMUEL, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-14-00511-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-01310-B. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, SOUTH PORT II APARTMENTS, Appellee Justices Lang-Miers and Brown participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.
It is ORDERED that appellee SOUTH PORT II APARTMENTS recover its costs of this appeal, if any, from appellant ANDREW SAMUEL.
Judgment entered this 5th day of August, 2014.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Andrew Samuel v. South Port II Apartments, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrew-samuel-v-south-port-ii-apartments-texapp-2014.