Andrew Richard Jones v. Department of Transportation
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ May 24, 2016
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A16A0540. JONES v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
In this condemnation action, Andrew Richard Jones is seeking consequential damages allegedly resulting to his easement rights in the condemned property. The Department of Transportation filed a motion in limine seeking to prevent Jones from introducing evidence as to certain damages he was claiming, arguing that such damages could not be recovered in a condemnation proceeding, but instead had to be sought in a separate action. The trial court agreed and entered an order granting the motion in limine. At Jones’s request, the trial court certified its order for immediate review. Jones then filed an application for a discretionary appeal, which we granted. Having now reviewed the appellate record and the briefs of the parties, we have concluded that the appeal was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 05/24/2016
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Andrew Richard Jones v. Department of Transportation (Andrew Richard Jones v. Department of Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.