Andrew P. Saldivar v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Andrew P. Saldivar v. United States

310 F.2d 739

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 11, 1962·No. 19704_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the order of the district judge denying appellant’s See. 2255 motion, seeking to set aside his conviction and sentence. The errors claimed by the appellant, if error at all, are not such errors as would support a collateral attack on the judgment and sentence. 1

The judgment and order appealed from are therefore

Affirmed.

1

. Larson v. United States, 5 Cir., 275 F.2d 673, cert. denied; 363 U.S. 849, 80 S.Ct. 1627, 4 L.Ed.2d 1732; Hill v. United States, 368 U.S. 424, 427-429, 82 S.Ct. 468, 7 L.Ed.2d 417; Alexander v. United States, 5 Cir., 290 F.2d 252, cert. denied 368 U.S. 891, 82 S.Ct. 144, 7 L. Ed.2d 89; Hodges v. United States, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 375, 282 F.2d 858.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the order of the district judge denying appellant’s See. 2255 motion, seeking to set aside his conviction and sentence. The errors claimed by the appellant, if error at all, are not such errors as would support a collateral attack on the judgment and sentence. 1

The judgment and order appealed from are therefore

Affirmed.

1

. Larson v. United States, 5 Cir., 275 F.2d 673, cert. denied; 363 U.S. 849, 80 S.Ct. 1627, 4 L.Ed.2d 1732; Hill v. United States, 368 U.S. 424, 427-429, 82 S.Ct. 468, 7 L.Ed.2d 417; Alexander v. United States, 5 Cir., 290 F.2d 252, cert. denied 368 U.S. 891, 82 S.Ct. 144, 7 L. Ed.2d 89; Hodges v. United States, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 375, 282 F.2d 858.

Andrew P. Saldivar v. United States, 310 F.2d 739 (5th Cir. 1962).

Pincite

310 F.2d 739 (Andrew P. Saldivar v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related