Andrew P. Koeszegi, Inc. v. Kizer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Andrew P. Koeszegi, Inc. v. Kizer

245 A.D. 701

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.D. 701 (Andrew P. Koeszegi, Inc. v. Kizer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andrew P. Koeszegi, Inc. v. Kizer, 245 A.D. 701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The testimony offered by the plaintiff tended to show that the Van Fleet order of November 19, 1929, procured through a party other than the defendant Sara J. Kizer, was improperly excluded.

The judgment so far as appealed from should, therefore, be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the defendants stipulate to reduce the judgment as entered by the sum of $588.30, in which event the judgment as so modified is affirmed, without costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Judgment so far as appealed from reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the defendants stipulate to reduce the judgment as entered by the sum of $588.30, in which event the judgment as so modified is affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The testimony offered by the plaintiff tended to show that the Van Fleet order of November 19, 1929, procured through a party other than the defendant Sara J. Kizer, was improperly excluded.

The judgment so far as appealed from should, therefore, be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the defendants stipulate to reduce the judgment as entered by the sum of $588.30, in which event the judgment as so modified is affirmed, without costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Judgment so far as appealed from reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the defendants stipulate to reduce the judgment as entered by the sum of $588.30, in which event the judgment as so modified is affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D. 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrew-p-koeszegi-inc-v-kizer-nyappdiv-1935.