Andrew Miller v. James H. Gomez Director of Corrections Dr. Fishman Dr. Battalino, Chief Medical Officer, Centinela State Prison and Dr. Harway
This text of 56 F.3d 72 (Andrew Miller v. James H. Gomez Director of Corrections Dr. Fishman Dr. Battalino, Chief Medical Officer, Centinela State Prison and Dr. Harway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
56 F.3d 72
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Andrew MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James H. GOMEZ; Director of Corrections; Dr. Fishman; Dr.
Battalino, Chief Medical Officer, Centinela State
Prison; and Dr. Harway, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-56492.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 16, 1995.*
Decided May 18, 1995.
Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
California state prisoner Andrew Miller appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that prison officials violated his constitutional right to adequate medical care by delaying surgery and not removing Miller from kitchen work detail. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F.3d 72, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19876, 1995 WL 306862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrew-miller-v-james-h-gomez-director-of-correcti-ca9-1995.