Andrew Lee Jones, Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 2, 2019
Docket10-18-00159-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Andrew Lee Jones, Jr. v. State (Andrew Lee Jones, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrew Lee Jones, Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00159-CR

ANDREW LEE JONES, JR., Appellant v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 85th District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 16-04190-CRF-85

REINSTATEMENT ORDER

This appeal was abated to the trial court to hold a hearing regarding correcting

inaccuracies, if any, in the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(e)(2). After a hearing,

the reporter’s record was corrected and, as corrected, was filed with this Court on

December 3, 2018. An exhibit, however, has not been filed. The exhibit, offered both as

Motion to Suppress Exhibit 21 and as State’s Exhibit 4, an in-car video, could not be

1 The parties at the abatement hearing and at the motion to suppress hearing refer to this Exhibit as Motion to Suppress Exhibit 2. However, it is labeled in the Exhibit volume as Motion to Suppress Exhibit 1. Whatever the label, the Court lacks the in-car video that was introduced. converted by the reporter to be electronically filed with this Court.

Accordingly, this appeal is reinstated, and the reporter is ORDERED to provide

the Court with a DVD containing a copy of the video admitted into evidence as Motion

to Suppress Exhibit 22 and as State’s Exhibit 4 within 14 days from the date of this Order.

The copy must be in a format that will allow the Court to view the video using industry

standard video software rather than any type of proprietary software. Further, the

Reporter is ORDERED to correct the Exhibit volume of the reporter’s record to reflect the

correct number assigned to the in-car video exhibit which was introduced during the

hearing on the defendant’s motion to suppress and file the corrected Exhibit volume

within 14 days from the date of this Order. Upon receipt, the DVD and the corrected

Exhibit volume will be filed as a part of the record in this appeal.

The State’s brief is due 30 days from the date the DVD and corrected Exhibit

volume are filed by the Court.3

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal reinstated Order issued and filed January 2, 2019

2 Or Motion to Suppress Exhibit 1, whichever is the in-car video.

3 Should one be filed on a date after the other is filed, the State’s brief is due 30 days from the later date.

Jones v. State Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Andrew Lee Jones, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrew-lee-jones-jr-v-state-texapp-2019.