ANDREW, KRISTINA v. v. ACCU REFERENCE MEDICAL

CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedApril 27, 2026
Docket2025-80-2643
StatusPublished

This text of ANDREW, KRISTINA v. v. ACCU REFERENCE MEDICAL (ANDREW, KRISTINA v. v. ACCU REFERENCE MEDICAL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ANDREW, KRISTINA v. v. ACCU REFERENCE MEDICAL, (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2026).

Opinion

FILED Apr 27, 2026 09:24 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MEMPHIS

KRISTINA ANDREW, Docket No. 2025-80-2643 Employee, v. ACCU REFERENCE MEDICAL, State File No. 8337-2025 Employer, and TECHNOLOGY INS. CO., Judge Shaterra R. Marion Carrier.

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

The Court held an expedited hearing on April 14, 2026, where Ms. Andrew sought benefits for injuries she suffered after a work altercation. Accu Reference argued that she did not give proper notice. For the reasons below, the Court holds that Ms. Andrew is not likely to show at a hearing on the merits that she gave proper notice, so her request for benefits is denied at this time.

Claim History

On May 21, 2024, Ms. Andrew worked as a phlebotomist for Accu Reference at a clinic. While speaking with the clinic owner about the improper disposal of a urine sample, another employee, Ashley James, burst into the room. She accused Ms. Andrew of blaming the mistake on her husband, another phlebotomist at the clinic.

Ms. Andrew and Ms. James argued, and then Ms. James grabbed Ms. Andrew by the throat, slammed her into the wall, and started scratching her. Ms. James’s husband stopped Ms. James, and they both left.

1 Ms. Andrew called the police and reported the incident. She told the police that Ms. James grabbed her by the throat and slammed her into the wall. She hit a side table and said she could not breathe, and Ms. James’s husband had to pull her off.

Ms. Andrew testified that she reported the incident to Trey Jamison, who she believed was one of her supervisors.

Mr. Jamison testified that he does not work for Accu Reference but for Frontier Health Solutions. He only represents Accu Reference in a sales capacity. He stated his primary job duties include acquiring new accounts and supporting staff at clinics to ensure they have all necessary supplies. He worked with Ms. Andrew as a colleague but did not supervise her.

Mr. Jamison stated that he does not have hiring and firing power over Ms. Andrew or anyone at Accu Reference. However, Ms. Andrew believed he hired her, and she testified that he fired the last phlebotomist who worked for Accu Reference at the clinic.

Ms. Andrew and Mr. Jamison texted on the night of the incident. She said: “Ashley came into my office flipping out today and attacked me.” Mr. Jamison asked if she was all right, and she replied, “Yes I’m ok. She didn’t punch or slap me. Just tried strangling me while I was in my chair. Just a typical soap opera day in the medical field lol.” Mr. Jamison did not tell anyone else at the time because Ms. Andrew told him she was not injured.

Alisha Hubbard is a phlebotomy supervisor for Accu Reference and was Ms. Andrew’s direct supervisor. Eight days after the incident, she asked Ms. Andrew why she did not clock in for work, and Ms. Andrew texted, “[t]here is drama at the clinic that the owner is working through.” Ms. Hubbard stated that Ms. Andrew did not detail the “drama,” and Ms. Hubbard did not ask. Instead, she instructed Ms. Andrew to “stay out of it.”

Ms. Andrew sought treatment on her own between May and December. She texted Mr. Jamison in December asking if he could file a workers’ compensation claim for her.1 He replied that she should contact human resources.

Both Mr. Jamison and Ms. Hubbard testified that the first time Ms. Andrew told them she possibly got hurt during the May 21 incident was in December, when

1 Ms. Andrew sought to introduce several work status notes from a clinic. The Court took their admissibility under advisement to inspect whether a physician signed the records. No physician signed the records, so they are inadmissible. 2 she asked about filing the workers’ compensation claim. Ms. Hubbard stated she did not even know Ms. Andrew was assaulted at work until December, because she only knew of the incident as “drama.” She also did not learn of Ms. Andrew’s injury until after Ms. Andrew filed her claim.

Ms. Andrew argued that Mr. Jamison was her supervisor and she timely notified him of the incident. Accu Reference argued that Mr. Jamison is not its employee and Ms. Andrew incorrectly notified him of an accident.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Ms. Andrew must prove she would likely prevail at a hearing on the merits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2025); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). An employee must give written notice to her employer upon the “occurrence of an injury.” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-201(a). Notice must be given within 15 days of the accident and must include the nature and cause of the “accident resulting in injury.” Id. § 50-6-201(c)(1) (emphasis added). Notice need not be given to an employer who has “actual knowledge of the accident.” Id. § 50-6-201(a). Here, the Court need not decide whether Mr. Jamison should be considered Ms. Andrew’s supervisor. Even if he were, she did not give proper notice. The Tennessee Supreme Court held that “an employee who relies upon alleged actual knowledge of the employer must prove that the employer had actual knowledge of the time, place, nature and cause of the injury.” Masters v. Indus. Garments Mfg. Co., 595 S.W.2d 811, 815 (Tenn. 1980) (emphasis added). In addition, “[f]or a communication to constitute either written notice or actual knowledge on the part of the employer it must be calculated to reasonably convey the idea to the employer that the employee claims to have suffered an injury arising out of and in the course of her employment.” Id. at 816. On the day of the incident, Ms. Andrews and Mr. Jamison texted. She described the incident as Ms. James trying to strangle her, with no “punch or slap.” Mr. Jamison asked if she was all right, and she said, “Yes I’m ok,” and “[j]ust a typical soap opera day in the medical field lol.” Neither the words nor the tone of her messages conveyed that she suffered an injury. Eight days later, Ms. Hubbard learned of the incident as “drama at the clinic.” Ms. Andrew at no time informed either Ms. Hubbard or Mr. Jamison that she had been injured in the assault.

3 Ms. Andrew’s statement to the police was more detailed and described being grabbed by the throat, slammed into a wall, and hitting a side table. However, no proof showed that anyone at Accu Reference or Mr. Jamison ever saw the police report. Further, both Mr. Jamison and Ms. Hubbard testified that Ms. Andrew first told them she might have been injured during the incident in December, seven months after it happened. Because Accu Reference did not have actual notice of the incident, Ms. Andrew had to give written notice within 15 days of its occurrence. She did not. Thus, the Court finds Ms. Andrew is not likely to show at a hearing on the merits that she gave proper notice of her alleged injury. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Ms. Andrew’s request for benefits is denied at this time.

2. The Court sets a status conference for June 22, 2026, at 11:15 a.m. Central Time. The parties must call (866) 943-0014 to participate. Failure to call might result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

ENTERED April 27, 2026.

____________________________________ JUDGE SHATERRA R. MARION Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

4 APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Mileage Reports 2. Panel selecting Dr. Keith Caruso 3. Medical Records – Dr. Glenn Crosby 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Masters v. Industrial Garments Manufacturing Co.
595 S.W.2d 811 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
ANDREW, KRISTINA v. v. ACCU REFERENCE MEDICAL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrew-kristina-v-v-accu-reference-medical-tennworkcompcl-2026.