Andrew Kline, in his official capacity as Colorado Deputy Secretary of State; and Jena Griswold, in her official capacity as Colorado Secretary of State v. No on EE - A Bad Deal for Colorado, Issue Committee.
This text of Andrew Kline, in his official capacity as Colorado Deputy Secretary of State; and Jena Griswold, in her official capacity as Colorado Secretary of State v. No on EE - A Bad Deal for Colorado, Issue Committee. (Andrew Kline, in his official capacity as Colorado Deputy Secretary of State; and Jena Griswold, in her official capacity as Colorado Secretary of State v. No on EE - A Bad Deal for Colorado, Issue Committee.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals Case No. 22CA2245
Petition for Writ of Certiorari GRANTED.
Whether the court of appeals erred by holding the registered agent disclosure requirement facially unconstitutional where the plaintiff (1) made no facial challenge in its complaint, (2) developed no record and made no argument in support of a facial challenge before the district court, and (3) presented no argument in support of a facial challenge to the court of appeals.
Whether the court of appeals erred by holding the registered agent disclosure requirement facially unconstitutional where disclosure serves compelling public interests and imposes no meaningful burden on issue committees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Andrew Kline, in his official capacity as Colorado Deputy Secretary of State; and Jena Griswold, in her official capacity as Colorado Secretary of State v. No on EE - A Bad Deal for Colorado, Issue Committee., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrew-kline-in-his-official-capacity-as-colorado-deputy-secretary-of-colo-2025.