Andrew Fisher Cycle Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Andrew Fisher Cycle Co. v. United States

50 Cust. Ct. 416

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 27, 1963

DocketReap. Dec. 10456; Entry No. 7607

StatusPublished

This text of 50 Cust. Ct. 416 (Andrew Fisher Cycle Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andrew Fisher Cycle Co. v. United States, 50 Cust. Ct. 416 (cusc 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement upon stipulation, on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402 (b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the bicycle tires, tubes, and rimtapes, imported from Holland, here involved, and that such values were the invoiced unit prices, as entered.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement upon stipulation, on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402 (b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the bicycle tires, tubes, and rimtapes, imported from Holland, here involved, and that such values were the invoiced unit prices, as entered.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 Cust. Ct. 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrew-fisher-cycle-co-v-united-states-cusc-1963.