Andrew David Nelson v. State
Opinion
IN THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS _____________________ _____
09-20-00102-CR 09-20-00103-CR 09-20-00104-CR 09-20-00105-CR __________________________
Andrew David Nelson V. The State of Texas
_________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 435th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 19-01-01183-CR, 19-01-01184-CR, 19-11-15284-CR, 19-11-15285-CR _________________________________________________________________
ORDER
Appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief
concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel certified that counsel provided copies of the
motion and brief to Appellant, advised Appellant of Appellant’s right to examine
the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied Appellant with a form
motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d
313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
Appellant requested access to the appellate record with this Court. We
hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide access to a paper copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification
to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on
or before Monday, December 21, 2020. See id., 436 S.W.3d at 321-22.
ORDER ENTERED December 1, 2020
PER CURIAM
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Andrew David Nelson v. State (Andrew David Nelson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.