Andrew David Nelson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 1, 2020·No. 09-20-00104-CR·Published

Opinion

IN THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS _____________________ _____

09-20-00102-CR 09-20-00103-CR 09-20-00104-CR 09-20-00105-CR __________________________

Andrew David Nelson V. The State of Texas

_________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 435th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 19-01-01183-CR, 19-01-01184-CR, 19-11-15284-CR, 19-11-15285-CR _________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief

concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel certified that counsel provided copies of the

motion and brief to Appellant, advised Appellant of Appellant’s right to examine

the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied Appellant with a form

motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d

313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Appellant requested access to the appellate record with this Court. We

hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide access to a paper copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification

to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on

or before Monday, December 21, 2020. See id., 436 S.W.3d at 321-22.

ORDER ENTERED December 1, 2020

PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrew David Nelson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Andrew David Nelson v. State (Andrew David Nelson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)