Andrew D. Zaron v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided February 28, 2022·No. 2:20-cv-00858·Unknown

Opinion

1 || Jeffrey Willis (NV Bar #4797) Erica J. Stutman (NV Bar #10794) 2 || Hayley J. Cummings (NV Bar #14858) Richard C. Gordon (NV Bar #9036) 3 || Jacob C. Jones (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 4 || 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 5 || Telephone: (702) 784-5200 Facsimile: (702) 784-5252 6 || E-Mail: jwillis@swlaw.com estutman@swlaw.com 7 hcummings@swlaw.com rgordon@swlaw.com 8 jcjones@swlaw.com 9 || Attorneys for Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Katherine Darrall 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1] DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 || MAURICIO JASSO, individually and in his Case No. 2:20-cv-00858-RFB-BNW = capacity as the Court-Appointed Receiver of 43 || JAMA INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., GUILLERMO SESMA, SYLVIA MARTINEZ STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 4222 14 || SALINAS, BELISARIO JASSO BALDINI, EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE JAVIER RAMIREZ LARES, ANTONIO RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ 7 15 || BACHALANI, RODRIGO FERNANDEZ, OBJECTION TO REPORT AND Sze JUAN ROMERO, and BERNARDO RECOMMENDATION [ECF NO. 199] 24 16 || VILLACECIAS, RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CORRECT AND AMEND 17 Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT v. [ECF 209] WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., KATHERINE 19 || DARRALL, and JOSE RICO, (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants. 20 21 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1) and Local Rule IA 6-1, Defendants 22 || Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Katherine Darrall together with Plaintiffs hereby stipulate and agree 23 || to extend Defendants’ deadline to file their Response to Plaintiffs’ Objection to Plaintiffs’ 24 | Objection to Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 199] Re: Motion for Leave to Correct and 25 || Amend Complaint [ECF No. 209] from March 4, 2022 to March 14, 2022 for the following reasons: 26 1. On February 18, 2022, Plaintiffs filed their objection to the Honorable Brenda 27 || Weksler’s order denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Correct and Amend Complaint, for which 28 || the local rules provide a 14-day response.

] 2. Accordingly, Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’'s Objection is due March 4, 2022. 2 3. Defendants’ counsel has been diligently working on the Response, but they require 3 || additional time in light of scheduled depositions, deadlines in this case and other matters, and a 4 || personal scheduling conflict by the attorney primarily responsible for drafting the Response. 5 4. No prejudice will result due to this ten-day extension. 6 5. This extension request is sought in good faith and is not made for the purpose of 7 || delay. 8 THEREFORE, for good cause shown, the Parties respectfully request an extension for 9 || Defendants to file their Response to Plaintiffs’ Objection to Report and Recommendation [ECF 10 |} No. 199] Re: Motion for Leave to Correct and Amend Complaint [ECF No. 209] from March 4, 11 || 2022 through and including March 14, 2022. 2 12 || DATED this 25" day of February, 2022. | #2 SNELL & WILMERLLP. AXS LAW GROUP, PLLC 14 s/Erica J. Stutman s/ Courtney Caprio (with permission) a 15 Jeffrey Willis (NV Bar No. 4797) Courtney Caprio (pro hac vice) | Erica J. Stutman (NV Bar No. 10794) Florida Bar No. 933961 16 Hayley J. Cummings (NV Bar No. 14858) Jeffrey W. Gutchess 2 7 Jacob C. Jones (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Florida Bar No. 702641 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 2121 NW 2™ Avenue, Suite 201 18 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Miami, Florida 33127 A Fi B A, gosto rel Fare Bas NA-end sono ROGER Anthony P. Sgro (NV Bar No. 3811) 20 Colleen N. Savage (NV Bar No 14947) 1 Kelly B. Stout (NV Bar No. 12105) 720 S. 7® Street, 3rd Floor 22 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 73 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 24 25 || IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 37 RICHA LWARE, Il United States District Court 28 DATED this 28th day of February, 2022. _2-

1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on February 25, 2022, I electronically transmitted the STIPULATION 3 | AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ 4 || OBJECTION TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [ECF NO. 199] RE: MOTION 5 || FOR LEAVE TO CORRECT AND AMEND COMPLAINT [ECF 209] with the Clerk of Court 6 || for the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada by using the Court’s CM/ECF system for filing. 7 || Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF system. 8 Mark J. Connot 9 Rex D. Garner FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 10 One Summerlin 1980 Festival Plaza Dr., Suite 700 11 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 mconnot@foxrothschild.com g 12 rgarner@foxrothschild.com | 5 g 13 Attorneys for Jose Rico | 14 || Anthony P. Sgro Colleen N. Savage 15 || KellyB. Stout SGRO & ROGER 16 || 7208S. 7% Street, 3rd Floor Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 ° 17 || tsgro@sgroandroger.com csavage(@sgroandroger.com 18 kstout@sgroandroger.com 19 Courtney Caprio Jeffrey W. Gutchess 20 | AXS LAW GROUP, PLLC 2121 NW 2" Avenue, Suite 201 21 | Miami, Florida 33127 courtney@axslawgroup.com 22 jeff@axslawgroup.com 23 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 24 s/ Jeanne Forrest 25 An employee of SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 4864-8378-4209.1 26 27 28 _3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrew D. Zaron v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (D. Nev. 2022).

Andrew D. Zaron v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Andrew D. Zaron v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.