Andrew Ciesla v. C. Christian

690 F. App'x 456
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 8, 2017
Docket16-2107
StatusUnpublished

This text of 690 F. App'x 456 (Andrew Ciesla v. C. Christian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrew Ciesla v. C. Christian, 690 F. App'x 456 (8th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Andrew Ciesla appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The district court entered its separate judgment on March 30, 2016, and Ciesla filed his notice of appeal on Saturday, April 30, 2016—more than 30 days later. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) (in civil case, notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of judgment or order appealed from). This court therefore lacks appellate jurisdiction over this untimely appeal. See Dieser v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 440 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir. 2006) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional; federal court will raise jurisdictional issues sua sponte).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

1

, The Honorable Abbie Crites-Leoni, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
690 F. App'x 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrew-ciesla-v-c-christian-ca8-2017.