Andrew Carman v. Jeremy Carroll

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 13-2371

_____________

ANDREW CARMAN and KAREN CARMAN, Appellants

v.

JEREMY CARROLL

_____________

On Appeal From the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (No. 3:10-cv-01013)

District Judge: Honorable James M. Munley

_____________

Submitted on December 12, 2014 After Remand by the Supreme Court of the United States

Before: MCKEE, Chief Judge, FUENTES, Circuit Judge, and SCHILLER, District Judge.1

____________

JUDGMENT ORDER

____________

This cause came to be heard on appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and upon remand from the Supreme Court of the United States

1 Honorable Berle M. Schiller, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

2

it is ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court denying Appellants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law on the unlawful entry claim and the jury verdict regarding the Appellants' unlawful seizure claim be and hereby are AFFIRMED.

By the Court,

s/ Julio M. Fuentes

Circuit Judge

ATTEST:

s/ Marcia M. Waldron Clerk

Dated: December 18, 2014