Andrew C. Smith v. American Medical Systems, Inc. v. Humana Hospital Corporation, Inc.
This text of 897 F.2d 794 (Andrew C. Smith v. American Medical Systems, Inc. v. Humana Hospital Corporation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In our original opinion, 1 we certified the following question to the Texas Supreme Court:
Under Texas law, is a seller of a product entitled to indemnification from the manufacturer for attorney’s fees incurred by seller during the litigation where the manufacturer settles the case with the plaintiff before a judicial determination of the liability of the parties is made?
In response to our certification, the Texas Supreme Court has ruled as follows: 2
*795 In this cause, there has been no judicial finding that American Medical Systems was negligent or that the prosthesis was unreasonably dangerous. In other words, there has been no judicial determination — or admission — that American Medical Systems was, or could have been legally liable to Smith in any way. Unless and until there is such a determination, Humana Hospital’s claim for indemnity is premature.
For the reasons stated previously, our answer to the certified question is “no”. 3
Therefore, the opinion of the district court is AFFIRMED.
. Smith v. American Medical Systems, Inc., 876 F.2d 434 (5th Cir.1989).
. Humana Hospital Corp. v. American Medical Systems, Inc., 785 S.W.2d 144 (Texas 1990).
. Id. at 145.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
897 F.2d 794, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 4768, 1990 WL 28664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrew-c-smith-v-american-medical-systems-inc-v-humana-hospital-ca5-1990.