Andrew Burnett v. Charles Baker

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 7, 2017
DocketA17D0251
StatusPublished

This text of Andrew Burnett v. Charles Baker (Andrew Burnett v. Charles Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrew Burnett v. Charles Baker, (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ February 07, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0251. ANDREW BURNETT v. CHARLES BAKER et al.

Acting pro se, Andrew Burnett sought to file on or about November 11, 2016 a mandamus petition and a pauper’s affidavit. The trial court conducted a hearing, then entered an order on December 14, 2016. Among other things, the order denied Burnett’s request to file the pleadings, citing OCGA § 9-15-2 (d). On January 12, 2017, Burnett filed this application for discretionary appeal. It appears that the order is subject to direct appeal.

Under OCGA § 9-15-2 (d), when a party who is not represented by an attorney presents a civil action for filing in forma pauperis, a judge of the trial court is required to review the pleading. Where a “pleading shows on its face such a complete absence of any justiciable issue of law or fact that it cannot be reasonably believed that the court could grant any relief against any party named in the pleading, then the judge shall enter an order denying filing of the pleading.” OCGA § 9-15-2 (d). See Ali v. Ross, 292 Ga. 86 (734 SE2d 882) (2012). An order denying filing of a pleading under this Code provision may be appealed directly. OCGA § 9-15-2 (d).

We will grant an otherwise timely application for discretionary appeal if the lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA §§ 5-6-35 (j); 5-6-34 (a) (1). Accordingly, this application is hereby GRANTED, and Burnett shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal with the trial court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (g). If he has already filed such notice of appeal in the trial court, he need not file a second notice. The clerk of the trial court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 02/07/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ali v. Ross
734 S.E.2d 882 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Andrew Burnett v. Charles Baker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrew-burnett-v-charles-baker-gactapp-2017.