Andrew Albert Wolfford v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 22, 2015
Docket03-15-00035-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Andrew Albert Wolfford v. State (Andrew Albert Wolfford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrew Albert Wolfford v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ACCEPTED 03-15-00035-CR 3855020 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/22/2015 8:52:22 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK NO. 03-15-00035-CR

ANDREW ALBERT WOLFFORD § IN THE THIRD FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS VS. § DISTRICT COURT OF AM 1/22/2015 8:52:22 JEFFREY D. KYLE THE STATE OF TEXAS § APPEALS OF TEXAS Clerk

MOTION TO DISMISS

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes the State of Texas, Appellee in the above styled and numbered

cause, and moves this Honorable Court to dismiss the Appeal related to ANDREW

ALBERT WOLFFORD’s trial court cause number CR2013-401, and for good

cause would show the following:

I.

Appellant pled guilty to the offense of Possession with Intent to Deliver a

Controlled Substance PG 1 > 4 Grams < 200 Grams, committed on November 23,

2012. Judgment of Conviction by Court at 1, attached. The Appellant entered into

a signed plea agreement with the State in which he waived his right to appeal from

the judgment and sentence. Waiver & Plea Bargain Agreement, State’s Exhibit 1 at

3, attached. The Court followed the plea agreement, sentencing Appellant to 35

years confinement in TDCJ on November 3, 2014 in Cause Number CR2013-401.

In the trial court’s certification, signed by Appellant and his counsel, the trial court

1 noted the defendant had waived and had no right of appeal. Trial Court’s

Certification at 1, attached.

II.

Appellant filed his untimely notice of appeal with the Court on January 16,

2015. As agreed to in the plea and stated in the Trial Court’s Certification of

Defendant’s Right of Appeal, the Appellant has waived the right of appeal and has

no right of appeal in this case. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d); see also Blanco

v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 220 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000) (finding no valid or

compelling reason defendant should not be held to his plea bargain waiver of his

right to appeal). The appeal should therefore be dismissed.

III.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the State’s counsel

respectfully prays that the Court dismiss Andrew Albert Wolfford’s Appeal.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Joshua D. Presley Joshua D. Presley, SBN: 24088254 preslj@co.comal.tx.us Comal Criminal District Attorney’s Office 150 N. Seguin Avenue, Suite 307 New Braunfels, Texas 78130 Ph: (830) 221-1300 / Fax: (830) 608-2008

2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Joshua D. Presley, assistant district attorney for the State of Texas, Appellee, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this Motion to Dismiss has been sent to Appellant ANDREW ALBERT WOLFFORD’s attorney of record:

Mr. E. Chevo Pastrano chevo@pastranolaw.com Attorney for Appellant Old Cotton Exchange Building 202 Travis, Suite 307 Houston, TX 77002

At the above email address by electronic mail through efile.txcourts.gov on this 22nd day of January, 2015:

/s/ Joshua D. Presley Joshua D. Presley

3 CASE No. CR2013-401 COUNT SINGLE INCIDENT No.fi'RN: 9212964818 TRS: A001 r cw -- f"o:t c:::J

:z: 0 .,, r fT1 0 THE STATE OF TExAs § < -n I 0 § -J :::0 v. § .., :::0 rrl :X 0 § r:-? 0 ::::J ANDREW ALBE T WOLFFORD § N CD 0 § STATE ID No.: TX-06866421 §

JUDGMENT OF C ONVICTION BY COURT-WAIVER OF J URY TRIAL Date Judgment J udge Presiding: H oN. DIBRELL WALDRIP Entered: NOVEMBER 3, 2014 Attorney for Attorney for State: SAMMY MCCRARY Defendant: JAMES PEPLINSKI Offense for which Defendant Convicted: POSSESSION WI'f'H INTENT TO DELIVER A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE PG 1 > 4 GRAMS < 200 GRAMS Charging Instrument: Statute for Qffense: INDICTMENT 481.112 (d) HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE Date of Offense: NOVEMBER 23, 012 Degree of Qffense: Plea to Offense: Findings on Deadly Weapon: FIRST DEGREE ELONY ENHANCED TO GUILTY NIA HABITUAL OFF NDER [12.42 (d)] Terms of Plea Bargaint THIRTY-FIVE (35) YEARS CONFINEMENT IN THE INSTITUTIONAL DMSION OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND $140.00 RESTITUTION Plea to 111 Enhancement Paragraph: TRUE Findings on 1'" Enhancement Paragraph : TRUE Plea to 2nd Enhancement Paragraph: TRUE Findings on 2nd Enhancement Paragraph: TRUE Plea to 3n1 EnhancemJpt Paragraph: TRUE Findings on 3rd Enhancement Paragraph: TRUE Dale Sentence Impoaep: NOVEMBER 3, 2014 Date Sentence to Commence: NOVEMBER 3, 2014 Punishment and Pia~ THIRTY-FIVE (35) YEARS CONFINEMENT IN THE INSTITUTIONAL DMSION, of Confinement: TDCJ THTS SF.NTENCE SHALL RUN CONCURRENTLY. 0 SENTENCE OF CONFINEMENT SUSPENDED, DEFENDANT PLACED ON COMMUNITY SUPERVISION FOR N/A Court Costs: Restitution: Restitution Payable to: 0 VICTIM (see below) 181 AGENCY/AGENT (see below) TRXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY RESTITUTlON ACCOUNTING $0.00 $0.00 $140.00 P.O. BOX 4087 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78773·0130 HDQ·l212·11G91 Sex Offender Registration Requirements do not apply to the Defendant. TEX. CODE CRrM. PROC. chapter 62 T he age of the victim at the time of the offense was N/A. If Defendant is to serve sentence in TQCJ. enter incarceration periods in chronological orde r. Time FROM 1U2312012 TO 02/28/2013 06/13/2013 TO ll/0312014 Credited: If Defendant is to serve sente nce in counly juil ur i!! lriven credit toward fine !!nd costs. enter days credited below. N/ADAYS NOTES: NIA All pertinent iofonnation, names and assessments indicated above are incorporated into tbc language ui the judgment below by reference. This cause was called for trial in COMAL County, 'T'exMI. The State appeared by her District Attorney.

CoW1Sel / Waiver of Couusel

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blanco v. State
18 S.W.3d 218 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Andrew Albert Wolfford v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrew-albert-wolfford-v-state-texapp-2015.