Andrew Aames v. United States
Opinion
Andrew Aames challenges the district court’s 1 dismissal of his complaint challenging the constitutionality of state and federal statutes requiring him to register as a sex offender. After carefully reviewing the record and the briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, but we modify the judgment so that the dismissal of Aames’s state-law request for relief is without prejudice. See Franklin v. Zain, 152 F.3d 783, 786 (8th Cir. 1998). The judgment is affirmed as modified. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
703 F. App'x 450 (Andrew Aames v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.