Andres Torres v. Appraisal District, Review Board

Court of Appeals of Texas

Andres Torres v. Appraisal District, Review Board

DecidedMay 3, 2001

Docket13-01-00052-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Andres Torres v. Appraisal District, Review Board (Andres Torres v. Appraisal District, Review Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andres Torres v. Appraisal District, Review Board, (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-01-052-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

ANDRES TORRES , Appellant,

v.

APPRAISAL DISTRICT, REVIEW BOARD , Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 138^th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yañez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, ANDRES TORRES , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 138^th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 00-01-25-B . No clerk's record has been filed due to appellant's failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record.

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk's record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On April 3, 2001 , notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed

this the 3^rd day of May, 2001.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-01-052-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

ANDRES TORRES , Appellant,

v.

APPRAISAL DISTRICT, REVIEW BOARD , Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 138^th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yañez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, ANDRES TORRES , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 138^th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 00-01-25-B . No clerk's record has been filed due to appellant's failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record.

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk's record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On April 3, 2001 , notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed

this the 3^rd day of May, 2001.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Andres Torres v. Appraisal District, Review Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andres-torres-v-appraisal-district-review-board-texapp-2001.