ANDRES RIGUEIRO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of ANDRES RIGUEIRO v. STATE OF FLORIDA (ANDRES RIGUEIRO v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
ANDRES RIGUEIRO, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D16-2118
[ July 13, 2017 ]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew Siegel, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2002-1010CF10A.
Andres Rigueiro, Doral, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ANDRES RIGUEIRO v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andres-rigueiro-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2017.