Andrés Ramos Jr. v. Gigi Castaneda
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
January 23, 2015
No. 04-14-00721-CV
Andrés RAMOS Jr.,
Appellant
v.
Gigi CASTANEDA,
Appellee
From the County Court, Maverick County, Texas Trial Court No. 3220
Honorable Ron Carr, Judge Presiding
ORDER
Appellant Andrés Ramos filed a brief on January 20, 2015. The brief does not comply with Rule 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1. Specifically, no part of the brief contains any citations to the record. See id. R. 38.1(g) (“The statement [of facts] must be supported by record references.”); id. R. 38.1(i) (“The brief must contain . . . appropriate citations . . . to the record.”). The brief contains no index of authorities. See id. R. 38.1(c). Further, except for a few references to Chapter 92 of the Texas Property Code, the brief fails to list or cite any authorities to support Appellant’s arguments. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(i) (requiring “appropriate citations to authorities and to the record”). 1 Moreover, the brief contains no proof of service. See id. R. 9.5(d), (e).
While substantial compliance with Rule 38 may be sufficient, this court may order a party to amend, supplement, or redraw a brief if it flagrantly violates Rule 38. See id. R. 38.9(a). We conclude that the formal defects described above constitute flagrant violations of Rule 38.
Therefore, we STRIKE Appellant’s brief and ORDER Appellant Andrés Ramos to file an amended brief within TEN DAYS of the date of this order. The amended brief must correct the violations listed above and fully comply with the applicable rules. See, e.g., id. R. 9.4, 9.5, 38.1.
1 Moreover, Appellant’s brief contains no appendix and the certificate of service is not signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(k), 9.5(e).
If the amended brief does not comply with this order, we “may strike the brief, prohibit [Appellant] from filing another, and proceed as if [Appellant] had failed to file a brief.” See id. R. 38.9(a); see also id. R. 38.8(a) (authorizing this court to dismiss an appeal if an appellant fails to timely file a brief).
If Appellant timely files a brief that complies with this order, Appellee’s brief will be due thirty days after Appellant’s brief is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).
Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of January, 2015.
Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Andrés Ramos Jr. v. Gigi Castaneda (Andrés Ramos Jr. v. Gigi Castaneda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.