Andres Karlsson v. Connie Josephine Troncale

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 ANDERS KARLSSON, et al., ) Case No. CV 19-8681 FMO (Ex) ) 11 Plaintiffs, ) ) 12 v. ) JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. ) P. 54(b) 13 CONNIE JOSEPHINE TRONCALE, et ) al., ) 14 ) Defendants. ) 15 ) 16 Pursuant to the Stipulated Application to Dismiss Defendant Connie J. Troncale with 17 Prejudice (Dkt. 36), and the Order Dismissing Defendant Troncale, the court finds that there is no 18 just reason to delay the entry of judgment with respect to plaintiffs’ claims against defendant 19 Troncale. Accordingly, IT IS ADJUDGED that the above-captioned action is dismissed with 20 prejudice as to defendant Troncale. The court shall not retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of 21 the settlement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381-82, 114 S.Ct. 22 1673, 1677 (1994). 23 Dated this 16th day of March, 2020. 24 25 /s/ Fernando M. Olguin 26 United States District Judge 27