Andres Karlsson v. Connie Josephine Troncale
Opinion
ANDERS KARLSSON, et al., ) Case No. CV 19-8681 FMO (Ex) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. ) P. 54(b) CONNIE JOSEPHINE TRONCALE, et ) al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Pursuant to the Stipulated Application to Dismiss Defendant Connie J. Troncale with Prejudice (Dkt. 36), and the Order Dismissing Defendant Troncale, the court finds that there is no just reason to delay the entry of judgment with respect to plaintiffs’ claims against defendant Troncale. Accordingly, IT IS ADJUDGED that the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice as to defendant Troncale. The court shall not retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381-82, 114 S.Ct. 1673, 1677 (1994). Dated this 16th day of March, 2020. /s/ Fernando M. Olguin United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Andres Karlsson v. Connie Josephine Troncale (Andres Karlsson v. Connie Josephine Troncale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.