ANDRES AMBROSIO DUQUESNE v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 21, 2021
Docket20-1395
StatusPublished

This text of ANDRES AMBROSIO DUQUESNE v. State (ANDRES AMBROSIO DUQUESNE v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ANDRES AMBROSIO DUQUESNE v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed April 21, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1395 Lower Tribunal No. F15-23351 ________________

Andres Ambrosio Duquesne, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Shearon Cruz, Judge.

Andres Ambrosio Duquesne, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.

MILLER, J. Andres Ambrosio Duquesne appeals the denial of his motion for

postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, in

which he raised eight claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm,

but note the order denying Duquesne’s motion only addressed four of the

eight issues alleged. Thus, we remand for the trial court to make a

determination as to the remaining claims. See Schrack v. State, 958 So. 2d

985, 986 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (“A trial court order that does not address all

of the claims for post-conviction relief will be remanded for entry of an order

that does.”) (citations omitted); Currelly v. State, 801 So. 2d 1000, 1000 (Fla.

2d DCA 2001) (“We conclude that the trial court should have treated this

motion as a postconviction relief motion . . . and addressed all three grounds

presented.”).

Affirmed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Currelly v. State
801 So. 2d 1000 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Schrack v. State
958 So. 2d 985 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
ANDRES AMBROSIO DUQUESNE v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andres-ambrosio-duquesne-v-state-fladistctapp-2021.