Andreas Boulamandis v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
This text of 247 F.2d 83 (Andreas Boulamandis v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant concedes that he is deport-able but argues that the Board of Immigration Appeals (and later the District Court) erroneously held him not eligible for suspension of deportation under § 19 (c) (2) (b) of the Immigration Act of 1917, as amended July 1, 1948. 1 To qualify under that statute appellant must have been “residing in the United States” on its effective date which was July 1, 1948. But appellant had left the country on January 18, 1947, in the exercise of a privilege of voluntary departure after an earlier order of deportation. An alien thus situated is not a resident of the United States. See Kristensen v. McGrath, 1949, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 48, 53-54, 179 F.2d 796, 801-802, affirmed, 1950, 340 U.S. 162, 71 S.Ct. 224, 95 L.Ed. 173. The judgment of the District Court is accordingly
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 F.2d 83, 101 U.S. App. D.C. 92, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andreas-boulamandis-v-herbert-brownell-jr-attorney-general-of-the-cadc-1957.