Andreadis v. Andreadis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Andreadis v. Andreadis

54 A.D.2d 724, 387 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14337

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 18, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 724 (Andreadis v. Andreadis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andreadis v. Andreadis, 54 A.D.2d 724, 387 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14337 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 11, 1976, which (1) dismissed his complaint for failure to serve and file a note of issue pursuant to a prior order of the same court and (2) granted leave to defendant to place the action on the undefended matrimonial calendar for inquest on her counterclaim. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the right to take a direct appeal terminated with the entry of the final judgment (see Matter ofAho, 39 NY2d 241, 248), without prejudice to an application by plaintiff to set aside that judgment, which was entered upon his default and which application, upon this record, should be granted. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 11, 1976, which (1) dismissed his complaint for failure to serve and file a note of issue pursuant to a prior order of the same court and (2) granted leave to defendant to place the action on the undefended matrimonial calendar for inquest on her counterclaim. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the right to take a direct appeal terminated with the entry of the final judgment (see Matter ofAho, 39 NY2d 241, 248), without prejudice to an application by plaintiff to set aside that judgment, which was entered upon his default and which application, upon this record, should be granted. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 724, 387 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andreadis-v-andreadis-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack