Andrea Realty Corp. v. Weaver

New York Supreme Court

Andrea Realty Corp. v. Weaver

17 Misc. 2d 78, 190 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2571

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 7, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 Misc. 2d 78 (Andrea Realty Corp. v. Weaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andrea Realty Corp. v. Weaver, 17 Misc. 2d 78, 190 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2571 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Henry Epstein, J.

This is a motion to direct the Temporary State Housing Bent Commission to review its order and determination denying petitioner’s protests and to direct the commission to grant the said protests. The rent increases (which were subsequently modified by the Bent Commission) were granted on the basis of the amount expended by the landlord for capital improvements. The reductions in those increases were based on a subsequent tax abatement granted by the City of New York based on the same improvements. The facts in this case are similar to those in Matter of Semel v. Weaver (17 Misc 2d 73), wherein the petition was dismissed. The papers submitted on this petition are not persuasive that the determination previously made in like cases in this court should be disturbed. For the reasons stated in the Semel case, the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henry Epstein, J.

This is a motion to direct the Temporary State Housing Bent Commission to review its order and determination denying petitioner’s protests and to direct the commission to grant the said protests. The rent increases (which were subsequently modified by the Bent Commission) were granted on the basis of the amount expended by the landlord for capital improvements. The reductions in those increases were based on a subsequent tax abatement granted by the City of New York based on the same improvements. The facts in this case are similar to those in Matter of Semel v. Weaver (17 Misc 2d 73), wherein the petition was dismissed. The papers submitted on this petition are not persuasive that the determination previously made in like cases in this court should be disturbed. For the reasons stated in the Semel case, the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Misc. 2d 78, 190 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrea-realty-corp-v-weaver-nysupct-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack