1 STEPHANIE FORMAN, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 195757 ERIC J. PALMER, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 231207 2 THARPE & HOWELL, LLP 3 15250 Ventura Blvd., Ninth Floor Sherman Oaks, California 91403 4 (818) 205-9955; (818) 205-9944 fax E-Mail: sforman@tharpe-howell.com 5 E-Mail: epalmer@tharpe-howell.com
6 Attorneys for Defendant, WALMART INC. 7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 ANDREA LINDER, Case No. 2:25-cv-05591 [Los Angeles County Superior Court Case 12 Plaintiff, No. 25LBCV01056]
13 v. [Assigned to District Judge Maame Ewusi- Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge 14 WALMART, INC. and DOES 1 to 50, Stephanie S. Christensen] inclusive, 15 Defendants. [DISCOVERY MATTER] 16 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER1 17
18 Complaint Filed: March 28, 2025 Trial Date: September 14, 2026 19 1. INTRODUCTION 20 1.1 Purposes and Limitations. Discovery in this action is likely to involve 21 production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special 22 protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting 23 this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and 24 petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 25 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or 26
27 1 This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based on the model protective order provided under Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen’s Procedures as of 28 1 responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure 2 and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to 3 confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. 4 1.2 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 5 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 26(c)(1) states in pertinent part, that the 6 Court, upon a showing of good cause may “issue an order to protect a party from 7 annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8 26(c)(1). In the instant matter, Defendant Walmart Inc.’s Confidential Documents 9 contain proprietary and confidential trade secret information relating to Defendant’s 10 business practices, policies and procedures, its safety protocol, and its video 11 surveillance system. Defendant Walmart Inc., (“Defendant” or “Walmart”) derives 12 independent economic value from maintaining the confidentiality of the policies and 13 procedures set forth in these Confidential Documents. 14 Defendant is a leading national retailer with its first store opening in 1962. The 15 retail industry is very competitive. As a result of years of investing time and money 16 in research and investigation, Defendant developed the policies contained in the 17 Confidential Documents for the purposes of maintaining the security of its facilities, 18 providing quality customer service, and ensuring the safety of its employees, 19 customers, and other invitees. These policies and procedures, as memorialized in the 20 Confidential Documents, were created and generated by Walmart for Walmart, and 21 are used for the purposes of maintaining safety at its stores and creating efficient and 22 organized work environments for its employees. As a result, Defendant is able to 23 minimize the waste of any resources, which is a key factor in generating profitability 24 for its business. 25 Defendant derives economic value from maintaining the secrecy of its Confidential 26 Documents. If disclosed to the public, the trade secret information contained in 27 Defendant’s Confidential Documents would reveal Defendant’s internal operations 28 and could potentially be used by competitors as a means to compete for its customers, 1 interfere with its business plans and thereby gain unfair business advantages. If 2 Defendant’s safety protocol were revealed to the general public, it would hinder 3 Defendant’s ability to effectively resolve and minimize liability claims, and its goal of 4 protecting its customers and employees from theft and other crimes. Unrestricted or 5 unprotected disclosure of such information would result in prejudice or harm to 6 Defendant by revealing Walmart’s competitive confidential information, which has 7 been developed at the expense of Walmart and which represents valuable tangible and 8 intangible assets. Accordingly, the parties respectfully submit that there is good cause 9 for the entry of this Protective Order. 10 1.3 Acknowledgment of Procedure for Filing Under Seal. The parties further 11 acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order 12 does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Local Rule 79-5 sets 13 forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when 14 a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 15 There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial 16 proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive motions, 17 good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana v. City and 18 Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips ex rel. Ests. of Byrd 19 v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210–11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. Sony 20 Elecs., Inc., 187 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even stipulated protective orders 21 require good cause showing), and a specific showing of good cause or compelling 22 reasons with proper evidentiary support and legal justification, must be made with 23 respect to Protected Material that a party seeks to file under seal. The parties’ mere 24 designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not— 25 without the submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the 26 material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as confidential, privileged, or otherwise 27 protectable—constitute good cause. 28 Further, if a party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial, then 1 compelling reasons, not only good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and the relief 2 sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be protected. See 3 Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677–79 (9th Cir. 2010). For each item 4 or type of information, document, or thing sought to be filed or introduced under seal 5 in connection with a dispositive motion or trial, the party seeking protection must 6 articulate compelling reasons, supported by specific facts and legal justification, for 7 the requested sealing order. Again, competent evidence supporting the application to 8 file documents under seal must be provided by declaration. 9 Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable in its 10 entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be redacted. If 11 documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public viewing, omitting only 12 the confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable portions of the document, shall 13 be filed. Any application that seeks to file documents under seal in their entirety should 14 include an explanation of why redaction is not feasible. 15 2. DEFINITIONS 16 2.1 Action: Andrea Linder v. Walmart, Inc., and Does 1-50, inclusive. Case 17 No. 2:35-CV-05591. 18 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation 19 of information or items under this Order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 STEPHANIE FORMAN, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 195757 ERIC J. PALMER, ESQ.; STATE BAR NO.: 231207 2 THARPE & HOWELL, LLP 3 15250 Ventura Blvd., Ninth Floor Sherman Oaks, California 91403 4 (818) 205-9955; (818) 205-9944 fax E-Mail: sforman@tharpe-howell.com 5 E-Mail: epalmer@tharpe-howell.com
6 Attorneys for Defendant, WALMART INC. 7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 ANDREA LINDER, Case No. 2:25-cv-05591 [Los Angeles County Superior Court Case 12 Plaintiff, No. 25LBCV01056]
13 v. [Assigned to District Judge Maame Ewusi- Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge 14 WALMART, INC. and DOES 1 to 50, Stephanie S. Christensen] inclusive, 15 Defendants. [DISCOVERY MATTER] 16 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER1 17
18 Complaint Filed: March 28, 2025 Trial Date: September 14, 2026 19 1. INTRODUCTION 20 1.1 Purposes and Limitations. Discovery in this action is likely to involve 21 production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special 22 protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting 23 this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and 24 petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 25 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or 26
27 1 This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based on the model protective order provided under Magistrate Judge Stephanie S. Christensen’s Procedures as of 28 1 responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure 2 and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to 3 confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. 4 1.2 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 5 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 26(c)(1) states in pertinent part, that the 6 Court, upon a showing of good cause may “issue an order to protect a party from 7 annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8 26(c)(1). In the instant matter, Defendant Walmart Inc.’s Confidential Documents 9 contain proprietary and confidential trade secret information relating to Defendant’s 10 business practices, policies and procedures, its safety protocol, and its video 11 surveillance system. Defendant Walmart Inc., (“Defendant” or “Walmart”) derives 12 independent economic value from maintaining the confidentiality of the policies and 13 procedures set forth in these Confidential Documents. 14 Defendant is a leading national retailer with its first store opening in 1962. The 15 retail industry is very competitive. As a result of years of investing time and money 16 in research and investigation, Defendant developed the policies contained in the 17 Confidential Documents for the purposes of maintaining the security of its facilities, 18 providing quality customer service, and ensuring the safety of its employees, 19 customers, and other invitees. These policies and procedures, as memorialized in the 20 Confidential Documents, were created and generated by Walmart for Walmart, and 21 are used for the purposes of maintaining safety at its stores and creating efficient and 22 organized work environments for its employees. As a result, Defendant is able to 23 minimize the waste of any resources, which is a key factor in generating profitability 24 for its business. 25 Defendant derives economic value from maintaining the secrecy of its Confidential 26 Documents. If disclosed to the public, the trade secret information contained in 27 Defendant’s Confidential Documents would reveal Defendant’s internal operations 28 and could potentially be used by competitors as a means to compete for its customers, 1 interfere with its business plans and thereby gain unfair business advantages. If 2 Defendant’s safety protocol were revealed to the general public, it would hinder 3 Defendant’s ability to effectively resolve and minimize liability claims, and its goal of 4 protecting its customers and employees from theft and other crimes. Unrestricted or 5 unprotected disclosure of such information would result in prejudice or harm to 6 Defendant by revealing Walmart’s competitive confidential information, which has 7 been developed at the expense of Walmart and which represents valuable tangible and 8 intangible assets. Accordingly, the parties respectfully submit that there is good cause 9 for the entry of this Protective Order. 10 1.3 Acknowledgment of Procedure for Filing Under Seal. The parties further 11 acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order 12 does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Local Rule 79-5 sets 13 forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when 14 a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 15 There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial 16 proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive motions, 17 good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana v. City and 18 Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips ex rel. Ests. of Byrd 19 v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210–11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. Sony 20 Elecs., Inc., 187 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even stipulated protective orders 21 require good cause showing), and a specific showing of good cause or compelling 22 reasons with proper evidentiary support and legal justification, must be made with 23 respect to Protected Material that a party seeks to file under seal. The parties’ mere 24 designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL does not— 25 without the submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the 26 material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as confidential, privileged, or otherwise 27 protectable—constitute good cause. 28 Further, if a party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial, then 1 compelling reasons, not only good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and the relief 2 sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be protected. See 3 Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677–79 (9th Cir. 2010). For each item 4 or type of information, document, or thing sought to be filed or introduced under seal 5 in connection with a dispositive motion or trial, the party seeking protection must 6 articulate compelling reasons, supported by specific facts and legal justification, for 7 the requested sealing order. Again, competent evidence supporting the application to 8 file documents under seal must be provided by declaration. 9 Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable in its 10 entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be redacted. If 11 documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public viewing, omitting only 12 the confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable portions of the document, shall 13 be filed. Any application that seeks to file documents under seal in their entirety should 14 include an explanation of why redaction is not feasible. 15 2. DEFINITIONS 16 2.1 Action: Andrea Linder v. Walmart, Inc., and Does 1-50, inclusive. Case 17 No. 2:35-CV-05591. 18 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation 19 of information or items under this Order. 20 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 21 how it is generated, stored, or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection 22 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause 23 Statement. 24 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 25 support staff). 26 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 27 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 28 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 1 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of 2 the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 3 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 4 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 5 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 6 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as 7 an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 8 2.8 Final Disposition: the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in 9 this Action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the 10 completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of 11 this Action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for 12 extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 13 2.9 In-House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 14 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 15 counsel. 16 2.10 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 17 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 18 2.11 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party 19 to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have 20 appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which 21 has appeared on behalf of that party, including support staff. 22 2.12 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 23 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 24 support staffs). 25 2.13 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 26 Discovery Material in this Action. 27 2.14 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 28 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 1 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and 2 their employees and subcontractors. 3 2.15 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 4 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 5 2.16 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 6 from a Producing Party. 7 3. SCOPE 8 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected 9 Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from 10 Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected 11 Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their 12 Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 13 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial 14 judge. This Stipulated Protective Order does not govern the use of Protected Material 15 at trial. 16 4. TRIAL AND DURATION 17 The terms of this Stipulated Protective Order apply through Final Disposition of 18 the Action. 19 Once a case proceeds to trial, information that was designated as CONFIDENTIAL 20 or maintained pursuant to this Stipulated Protective Order and used or introduced as 21 an exhibit at trial becomes public and will be presumptively available to all members 22 of the public, including the press, unless compelling reasons supported by specific 23 factual findings to proceed otherwise are made to the trial judge in advance of the trial. 24 See Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1180–81 (distinguishing “good cause” showing for sealing 25 documents produced in discovery from “compelling reasons” standard when merits- 26 related documents are part of court record). Accordingly, for such materials, the terms 27 of this Stipulated Protective Order do not extend beyond the commencement of the 28 trial. 1 Even after Final Disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations 2 imposed by this Stipulated Protective Order shall remain in effect until a Designating 3 Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. 4 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. 6 Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this 7 Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies 8 under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for protection 9 only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that 10 qualify so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications 11 for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of 12 this Order. 13 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that 14 are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose 15 (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the case development process or to impose 16 unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Designating Party 17 to sanctions. 18 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it 19 designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must 20 promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the inapplicable designation. 21 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in 22 this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of Section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise 23 stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection 24 under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or 25 produced. 26 Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 27 (a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic 28 documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial 1 proceedings), that the Producing Party affix at a minimum, the legend 2 “CONFIDENTIAL” (hereinafter “CONFIDENTIAL legend”), to each page that 3 contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page 4 qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected 5 portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 6 A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents available for 7 inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has 8 indicated which documents it would like copied and produced. During the inspection 9 and before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be 10 deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents 11 it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, 12 or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing 13 the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL 14 legend” to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of 15 the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly 16 identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 17 (b) for testimony given in depositions that the Designating Party identify 18 the Disclosure or Discovery Material on the record, before the close of the deposition 19 all protected testimony. 20 (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for 21 any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the 22 exterior of the container or containers in which the information is stored the legend 23 “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the information warrants 24 protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected 25 portion(s). 26 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent 27 failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the 28 Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon 1 timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts 2 to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Stipulated 3 Protective Order. 4 6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 5 a. Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a 6 designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the court’s Scheduling 7 Order. 8 b. Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute 9 resolution process under Local Rule 37.1 et seq. and with Section 2 of Judge 10 Christensen’s Civil Procedures titled “Brief Pre-Discovery Motion Conference.” 11 c. The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on 12 the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose 13 (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties), may 14 expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived 15 or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties shall continue to afford the 16 material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the 17 Producing Party’s designation until the Court rules on the challenge. 18 7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 19 a. Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that 20 is disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this 21 Action only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this Action. Such 22 Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the 23 conditions described in this Order. When the Action has been terminated, a 24 Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of Section 13 below (FINAL 25 DISPOSITION). 26 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a 27 location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons 28 authorized under this Order. 1 b. Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless 2 otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a 3 Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” 4 only to: 5 (a) to the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, as 6 well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably 7 necessary to disclose the information for this Action; 8 (b) to the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of 9 the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action; 10 (c) to Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom 11 disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the 12 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 13 (d) to the court and its personnel; 14 (e) to court reporters and their staff; 15 (f) to professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional 16 Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have 17 signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 18 (g) to the author or recipient of a document containing the information or 19 a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information; 20 (h) during their depositions, to witnesses, and attorneys for witnesses, in 21 the Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary, provided: (1) the deposing 22 party requests that the witness sign the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be 23 Bound” (Exhibit A); and (2) the witness will not be permitted to keep any confidential 24 information unless they sign the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” 25 (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. 26 Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal 27 Protected Material may be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be 28 disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order; and 1 (i) to any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel, 2 mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement discussions. 3 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED 4 PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION 5 If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation 6 that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as 7 “CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party must: 8 (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification 9 shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order; 10 (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order 11 to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena 12 or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of 13 this Stipulated Protective Order; and 14 (c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued 15 by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected. 16 If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with 17 the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action 18 as “CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the subpoena 19 or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s permission. The 20 Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court 21 of its confidential material and nothing in these provisions should be construed as 22 authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action to disobey a lawful 23 directive from another court. 24 9. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE 25 PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION 26 9.1 Application. The terms of this Stipulated Protective Order are 27 applicable to information produced by a Non-Party in this Action and designated as 28 “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information produced by Non-Parties in connection with 1 this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing 2 in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking 3 additional protections. 4 9.2 Notification. In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery 5 request, to produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the 6 Party is subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s 7 confidential information, then the Party shall: 8 (a) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that 9 some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement 10 with a Non-Party; 11 (b) make the information requested available for inspection by the Non- 12 Party, if requested. 13 9.3 Conditions of Production. If the Non-Party fails to seek a protective 14 order from this court within 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying 15 information, the Receiving Party may produce the Non-Party’s confidential 16 information responsive to the discovery request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a 17 protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its 18 possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non- 19 Party before a determination by the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the 20 Non-Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its 21 Protected Material. 22 10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 23 If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed 24 Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this 25 Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in 26 writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts 27 to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or 28 persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, 1 and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and 2 Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A). 3 11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE 4 PROTECTED MATERIAL 5 When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain 6 inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, 7 the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Rule 26(b)(5)(B) of the 8 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This provision is not intended to modify whatever 9 procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production 10 without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Rules 502(d) and (e) of the Federal Rules 11 of Evidence, insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a 12 communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work 13 product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated 14 protective order submitted to the court. 15 12. MISCELLANEOUS 16 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Stipulated Protective Order 17 abridges the right of any person to seek its modification by the court in the future. 18 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this 19 Stipulated Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object 20 to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this 21 Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any 22 ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Stipulated Protective 23 Order. 24 12.3 Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any 25 Protected Material must comply with Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may only 26 be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific 27 Protected Material at issue. If a Party's request to file Protected Material under seal is 28 denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information in the public 1 record unless otherwise instructed by the court. 2 13. FINAL DISPOSITION 3 After the Final Disposition of this Action, as defined in paragraph 4, within 60 4 days of a written request by the Designating Party, each Receiving Party must return 5 all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As used in this 6 subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, 7 summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected 8 Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party 9 must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person 10 or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that (1) identifies (by 11 category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed 12 and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, 13 compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the 14 Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel is entitled to retain an 15 archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, 16 legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, 17 attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials 18 contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute 19 Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4. 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// | 14. VIOLATION 2 Any violation of this Stipulated Protective Order may be punished by any and 3|| all appropriate measures including, without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or monetary sanctions. 5 6 7\| IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 8 EISENBERG LAW GROUP 9 Dated: September 25, 2025 10 By: ___/s/ Vick V_Petrosian JASON G. EISENBERG gq il VICK V. PETROSIAN a Attorneys for Plaintiff, ANDREA LINDER
zo THARPE & HOWELL, LLP 15 Dated: September 25, 2025 By: /s/ Eric J. Palmer 16 STEPHANIE FORMAN Se 17 ERIC J. PALMER Attorneys for Defendant, 18 WALMART INC. Eric J. Palmer, the filer of this document, attests that all other signatories listed above, and on whose behalf this filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the 20 filing, pursuant to L.R. 5-4.3.4(a)(2)(i). 21 92 || FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24|| DATED: September 25, 2025 Z Hon. Stephanie S. Christensen 25 United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28 Ve]
1 EXHIBIT A 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
3 I, ________________________ [print or type full name], of 4 __________________________________ [print or type full address], declare 5 under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the 6 Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for 7 the Central District of California on [date] in the case of Andrea Linder v 8 Walmart, Inc. and Does1-50 inclusive. Case No:2:25-cv-05591. I agree to comply 9 with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I 10 understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to 11 sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I 12 will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this 13 Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance 14 with the provisions of this Order. 15 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District 16 Court for the Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms 17 of this Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur 18 after termination of this action. I hereby appoint ___________________________ 19 [print or type full name] of ________________________________ [print or 20 type full address and telephone number] as 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any 2 proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order. 3 4 Date: ___________________________ 5 City and State where sworn and 6 signed: ___________________________ 7 Printed name: ___________________________ 8 Signature: ___________________________ 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28