Andrea Jones v. DirecTV, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Andrea Jones v. DirecTV, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 381 F. App'x 895
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 22, 2011·No. 11-10887·Unpublished

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NOVEMBER 22, 2011 No. 11-10887 JOHN LEY CLERK

D. C. Docket No. 1:09-cv-01036-CAP

ANDREA JONES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DIRECTV, INC., THE DIRECTV GROUP, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

(November 22, 2011)

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, COX, Circuit Judge, and GOLDBERG,* Judge.

* Honorable Richard W. Goldberg, United States Court of International Trade Judge, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM:

Appellant Andrea Jones appeals from the district court’s grant of a motion

to compel arbitration pursuant to an arbitration clause in her DirecTV service

agreement.

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the

benefit of oral argument, we affirm the judgment of the district court based upon

AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S. Ct. 1760 (2011), and

Cappuccitti v. DirecTV, 623 F.3d 1118, 1126 (11th Cir. 2010).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrea Jones v. DirecTV, Inc., (11th Cir. 2011).

Andrea Jones v. DirecTV, Inc. (Andrea Jones v. DirecTV, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cappuccitti v. DirecTV, Inc.
623 F.3d 1118 (Eleventh Circuit, 2010)