Andrea Gogel v. Kia Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc.
This text of Andrea Gogel v. Kia Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc. (Andrea Gogel v. Kia Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 16-16850 Date Filed: 06/17/2019 Page: 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________
No. 16-16850 ________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:14-cv-00153-TCB
ANDREA GOGEL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KIA MOTORS MANUFACTURING OF GEORGIA, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________
Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, MARCUS, WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, and GRANT, Circuit Judges*:
* Judge Newsom, having recused himself, did not participate in the poll. Case: 16-16850 Date Filed: 06/17/2019 Page: 2 of 2
A petition for rehearing en banc having been filed, a member of this Court in
active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en
banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in
favor of granting rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that this case will be reheard
en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Andrea Gogel v. Kia Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrea-gogel-v-kia-motors-manufacturing-of-georgia-inc-ca11-2019.