Andrea Gogel v. Kia Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Andrea Gogel v. Kia Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 967 F.3d 1121
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 17, 2019·No. 16-16850·Published

Opinion

Case: 16-16850 Date Filed: 06/17/2019 Page: 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-16850

D.C. Docket No. 3:14-cv-00153-TCB

ANDREA GOGEL, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KIA MOTORS MANUFACTURING OF GEORGIA, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, MARCUS, WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, and GRANT, Circuit Judges*:

*

Judge Newsom, having recused himself, did not participate in the poll.

Case: 16-16850 Date Filed: 06/17/2019 Page: 2 of 2

A petition for rehearing en banc having been filed, a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrea Gogel v. Kia Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc., (11th Cir. 2019).

Andrea Gogel v. Kia Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc. (Andrea Gogel v. Kia Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.