Andrea Felix v. Villages of Copperfield
Opinion
Opinion issued June 23, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
(Vernon Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and before the Judicial Panel on Multi- district Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).
On March 17, 2015, we notified appellant, at the address provided in her notice of appeal, that the filing fee had not been paid and her appeal could be dismissed unless she paid the fee by April 16, 2015. On April 22, 2015, we notified appellant, at the same address, that the trial court clerk had notified the Court that the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid, or made arrangements to pay for, the clerk’s record, and the appeal could be dismissed unless she responded by May 22, 2015. This Court’s second notice was returned, with the following marked on the envelope: “return to sender, not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward.” Appellant has not paid the fees, responded to the Court’s notices, or provided us with any other mailing address. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c); cf. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.1(b) (requiring unrepresented party to provide party’s mailing address on all documents filed with court).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Andrea Felix v. Villages of Copperfield (Andrea Felix v. Villages of Copperfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.