Andrea Christine Folkers v. State
This text of Andrea Christine Folkers v. State (Andrea Christine Folkers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _____________________ _____
09-16-00044-CR __________________________
ANDREA CHRISTINE FOLKERS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 4 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 15-303511 _________________________________________________________________
ORDER The clerk’s record in the above styled and numbered cause was filed
March 24, 2016, and the reporter’s record was filed May 10, 2016. On July 13,
2016, the Court granted an extension of time to file the brief. On September 2,
2016, the appellant’s court-appointed attorney, Jarrod Walker, was notified that
neither the brief of the appellant nor a motion for extension of time to file the
brief has been filed. Although the brief of the appellant was due to be filed
August 10, 2016, the brief has not been filed.
We abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a
hearing at which a representative of the State, counsel for the appellant, and the
appellant shall be present in person. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(3). If the 1 appellant is not incarcerated, but fails to appear at the hearing after having been
notified to do so, or after reasonable attempts to notify her have been made,
then the trial court may enter a finding that appellant no longer desires to
pursue the appeal and send said finding to this Court. See Tex. R. App. P.
38.8(b)(4). If the appellant is present for the hearing, we direct the trial court
to determine whether or not appellant desires to pursue her appeal. If appellant
desires to pursue her appeal, we direct the trial court to determine why the brief
of the appellant has not been filed, why appellant’s counsel has not responded
to late notices from this Court, and whether good cause exists for appointed
counsel, Jarrod Walker, to be relieved of his duties as appellate counsel and
replaced by substitute counsel. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.04(j)(2)
(West Supp. 2016). If the trial court determines that good cause exists to
relieve appointed counsel of his duties, we direct the trial court to appoint
substitute counsel.
The record of the hearing, including any orders and findings of the trial
court judge, shall be sent to the appellate court for filing. The court reporter’s
record of the hearing and the clerk’s record containing the recommendations of
the trial court judge are to be filed on or before Monday, October 26, 2016.
ORDER ENTERED September 26, 2016.
PER CURIAM
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Andrea Christine Folkers v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrea-christine-folkers-v-state-texapp-2016.