Andrea Catalina Cruz v. Gerardo Morales

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 16, 2024
Docket3D2023-1560
StatusPublished

This text of Andrea Catalina Cruz v. Gerardo Morales (Andrea Catalina Cruz v. Gerardo Morales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrea Catalina Cruz v. Gerardo Morales, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed October 16, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-1560 Lower Tribunal No. 20-15879 ________________

Andrea Catalina Cruz, Appellant,

vs.

Gerardo Morales, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David Young, Judge.

Davis Smith & Jean, LLC, and Laura Davis Smith and Sonja A. Jean, for appellant.

Orshan, Spann & Fernandez-Mesa, and Steven P. Spann, for appellee.

Before EMAS, BOKOR and GOODEN, JJ.

EMAS, J. Appellant Andrea Catalina Cruz appeals from the trial court’s order

denying her petition to relocate with her minor child. The trial court held an

evidentiary hearing over the course of four days, and thereafter entered an

order denying the petition for relocation, which properly considered and

analyzed each of the requisite factors enumerated in section 61.13001,

Florida Statutes (2023). “When reviewing an order on a petition to relocate,

an appellate court is limited to an abuse of discretion review based on

whether the statutory findings made by the trial court are supported by

competent, substantial evidence.” Mignott v. Mignott, 337 So. 3d 408, 410

(Fla. 3d DCA 2021). We find the trial court’s order, and its statutory findings,

are supported by competent, substantial evidence, and further conclude that

no reversible error was committed during the evidentiary hearing. 1

Affirmed.

1 We further note that establishing that relocation is in the best interest of the relocating parent is not the same as establishing that relocation is in the best interest of the child. See, e.g., Coyle v. Coyle, 8 So. 3d 1271, 1272 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (noting that trial court erred in focusing on whether the mother’s relocation “would improve the quality of her life, not necessarily the life of the child”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coyle v. Coyle
8 So. 3d 1271 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Andrea Catalina Cruz v. Gerardo Morales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrea-catalina-cruz-v-gerardo-morales-fladistctapp-2024.