Andrea Catalina Cruz v. Gerardo Morales
This text of Andrea Catalina Cruz v. Gerardo Morales (Andrea Catalina Cruz v. Gerardo Morales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 16, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-1560 Lower Tribunal No. 20-15879 ________________
Andrea Catalina Cruz, Appellant,
vs.
Gerardo Morales, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David Young, Judge.
Davis Smith & Jean, LLC, and Laura Davis Smith and Sonja A. Jean, for appellant.
Orshan, Spann & Fernandez-Mesa, and Steven P. Spann, for appellee.
Before EMAS, BOKOR and GOODEN, JJ.
EMAS, J. Appellant Andrea Catalina Cruz appeals from the trial court’s order
denying her petition to relocate with her minor child. The trial court held an
evidentiary hearing over the course of four days, and thereafter entered an
order denying the petition for relocation, which properly considered and
analyzed each of the requisite factors enumerated in section 61.13001,
Florida Statutes (2023). “When reviewing an order on a petition to relocate,
an appellate court is limited to an abuse of discretion review based on
whether the statutory findings made by the trial court are supported by
competent, substantial evidence.” Mignott v. Mignott, 337 So. 3d 408, 410
(Fla. 3d DCA 2021). We find the trial court’s order, and its statutory findings,
are supported by competent, substantial evidence, and further conclude that
no reversible error was committed during the evidentiary hearing. 1
Affirmed.
1 We further note that establishing that relocation is in the best interest of the relocating parent is not the same as establishing that relocation is in the best interest of the child. See, e.g., Coyle v. Coyle, 8 So. 3d 1271, 1272 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (noting that trial court erred in focusing on whether the mother’s relocation “would improve the quality of her life, not necessarily the life of the child”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Andrea Catalina Cruz v. Gerardo Morales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrea-catalina-cruz-v-gerardo-morales-fladistctapp-2024.