Andre v. Bienvenu
1 Mart. 148
Opinion
New trials are always in the discretion of the court, they ought to be enabled [149]*149to judge of the materiality of the facts for the proof of which another trial is desired. We required it before a continuance was granted in the case of Mann & Bernard vs. Hunt & Smith, ante 22.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Andre v. Bienvenu, 1 Mart. 148 (La. 1810).
1 Mart. 148 (Andre v. Bienvenu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goldsmith v. Unity Industrial Life Insurance
128 So. 182 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1930)
Handy v. N. O. Public Service, Inc.
127 So. 753 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1930)