Andre v. Beha
This text of 148 N.E. 724 (Andre v. Beha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff as managing director for Northern Insurance Company of Moscow is not the real party in interest and may not maintain this action as such. (Spencer v. Standard C. & M. Corp., 237 N. Y. 479.)
As a stockholder suing in a representative capacity in the right of the corporation he has not made out a cause of action since no waste of corporate assets is threatened. (Howes v. City of Oakland, 104 U. S. 450.)
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Lehman, JJ., concur; Crane, J., dissents; Andrews, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
148 N.E. 724, 240 N.Y. 605, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andre-v-beha-ny-1925.