Andre v. Beha

148 N.E. 724, 240 N.Y. 605, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 834
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 7, 1925·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff as managing director for Northern Insurance Company of Moscow is not the real party in interest and may not maintain this action as such. (Spencer v. Standard C. & M. Corp., 237 N. Y. 479.)

As a stockholder suing in a representative capacity in the right of the corporation he has not made out a cause of action since no waste of corporate assets is threatened. (Howes v. City of Oakland, 104 U. S. 450.)

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Lehman, JJ., concur; Crane, J., dissents; Andrews, J., not voting.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andre v. Beha, 148 N.E. 724, 240 N.Y. 605, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 834 (N.Y. 1925).

148 N.E. 724 (Andre v. Beha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.
92 F. Supp. 920 (N.D. California, 1950)
Matter of People (Norske Lloyd Ins. Co.)
151 N.E. 159 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)
Andre v. Beha, Byers
150 N.E. 563 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)
Severnoe Securities Corp. v. Westminster Bank, Ltd.
214 A.D. 14 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)