Andre Santonio Hill v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Andre Santonio Hill v. State of Florida

186 So. 3d 1119, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3636, 2016 WL 903660

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 9, 2016

Docket4D15-4176

StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 3d 1119 (Andre Santonio Hill v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andre Santonio Hill v. State of Florida, 186 So. 3d 1119, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3636, 2016 WL 903660 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Andre Hill appeals the 'trial court’s order striking his rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. The court found that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the motion due to appellant’s pending appeal from the denial'of a related claim in a rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We also find that appellant’s claim is meritless. Robbery with a deadly weapon is a first degree felony punishable by life imprisonment, § 812.13(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003). The trial court was required to impose a life sentence under the prison releasee reoffender : statute. See § 775.082(9)(a)3.a., Fla. Stat. (2003); McDonald v. State, 957 So.2d 605, 612-13 (Fla.2007).

Affirmed.'

CIKLIN, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ,, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI