Andre Powell v. Bruce Lemmon

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedFebruary 12, 2010
Docket09-3376
StatusPublished

This text of Andre Powell v. Bruce Lemmon (Andre Powell v. Bruce Lemmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andre Powell v. Bruce Lemmon, (7th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit _________________

No. 09-3376

ANDRE V. POWELL, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

BRUCE LEMMON, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division. No. 2:08-cv-00355-LJM-JMS–Larry J. McKinney, Judge.

MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

FEBRUARY 12, 2010*

* This opinion was released initially in typescript form. No. 09-3376 Page 2

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge (in chambers). Andre Powell brought a habeas action challenging his prison’s imposition of disciplinary sanctions. He pleaded himself out of court, however, by revealing in his petition that the prison already had vacated its discipline order and had scheduled a new hearing. The district court consequently dismissed the petition as moot. Mr. Powell moved the court to reconsider; it declined to do so. He also moved for relief from judgment. The court denied this motion. Mr. Powell’s appeal is timely only as to the denial of his motion for relief from judgment.

By order dated February 8, 2010, this court, agreeing with the district court, denied permission to proceed in forma pauperis. In that order, the court gave Mr. Powell 14 days to pay the required docketing fee or to withdraw his appeal.

Before me today is a motion filed by Mr. Powell on the same day as our earlier order. Since Mr. Powell is incarcerated, it no doubt left his control on an earlier date. In that motion, Mr. Powell states that the dispute is moot and asks that we dismiss his appeal for lack of jurisdiction. This motion falls within the ambit of F.R.A.P. 42(b) and an order may be entered by the Clerk dismissing the appeal. Because Mr. Powell took this action well within the time permitted for the withdrawal of his appeal without the payment of the docketing fee, he is not liable for that fee, and none should be assessed.

Accordingly the Clerk is ordered to dismiss this appeal under F.R.A.P. 42(b). In conformity with the court’s earlier order, no docketing fee is to be paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Andre Powell v. Bruce Lemmon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andre-powell-v-bruce-lemmon-ca7-2010.