Andre Nigel Bennett v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 4, 2014·No. 14-14-00474-CR·Published

Opinion

Order filed December 4, 2014

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-14-00474-CR ____________

ANDRE NIGEL BENNETT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1357744

ORDER

On October 28, 2014, notice was sent to appointed counsel, Glenn J. Youngblood, as follows:

We have received your appellate brief filed under the authority of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). To comply with Anders, the Court of Criminal Appeals now requires you to notify your client of his/her right to access the appellate record and provide him/her with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, No. PD-0702-13; — S.W.3d — 2014 WL 2865901 (Tex. Crim. App. June 25, 2014). In compliance with Kelly, please provide the court with an amended transmittal letter in which you provide your client with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. An example of a form motion is attached. Please file the amended transmittal letter within 20 days.

As of this date, the court has not received the requested documentation. Accordingly, we order Glenn J. Youngblood to file an amended transmittal letter in which you notify your client of his/her right to access the appellate record and provide him/her with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record within 10 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andre Nigel Bennett v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Andre Nigel Bennett v. State (Andre Nigel Bennett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)