Andre Jones v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 26, 2018·No. A19A0209·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ September 18, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0209. ANDRE JONES v. THE STATE.

On October 27, 2016, Andre Jones pled guilty to trafficking a person for sexual servitude, pimping, and pandering. The trial court sentenced Jones to ten years of probation for trafficking, which was consecutive to two concurrent nine-year sentences for pimping and pandering. Thus, Jones’ total sentence was for 19 years, with nine to serve. On March 6, 2018, Jones filed a pro se motion to correct a void sentence, arguing that the trial court erred in failing to impose a split sentence as required by OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b). The trial court denied the motion, and Jones filed this appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Under OCGA § 17-10-1 (f), a court may modify a sentence during the year after its imposition or within 120 days after remittitur following a direct appeal, whichever is later. Frazier v. State, 302 Ga. App. 346, 348 (691 SE2d 247) (2010). Once, as here, this statutory period expires, a trial court may only modify a void sentence. Id. And a direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate or correct a void sentence only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 217 (1) n.1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). When a sentence is within the statutory range of punishment, it is not void. Jones v. State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004). Under OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b), any person convicted of a sexual offense shall be sentenced to a split sentence, which must include a term of probation of at least one year. The offenses for which Jones was convicted are not included in the statute’s definition of “sexual offenses.” See OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (a). Thus, the statute does not apply to Jones’ sentence. Because Jones has not raised a colorable void-sentence claim, he is not entitled to a direct appeal, and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 09/18/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andre Jones v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).

Andre Jones v. State (Andre Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harper v. State
686 S.E.2d 786 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)
Jones v. State
604 S.E.2d 483 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2004)
Frazier v. State
691 S.E.2d 247 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2010)
Burg v. State
676 S.E.2d 465 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)