Andre Hylton v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-11-00016-CR
ANDRE HYLTON APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM THE 367TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ----------
On January 11, 2011, Appellant Andre Hylton filed a notice of appeal from
a judgment imposed on September 8, 2010, convicting him of theft. Apparently
recognizing that he had filed the notice of appeal late, see Tex. R. App.
P. 26.2(a)(1), Hylton also filed a motion for an out-of-time appeal. This court
does not have authority to grant an out-of-time appeal. See Slaton v. State, 981
S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (reasoning that if an appeal is not timely
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of
the appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal).
Accordingly, we deny Hylton’s motion for an out-of-time appeal, and we dismiss
this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Olivo v. State,
918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: March 10, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Andre Hylton v. State (Andre Hylton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.