Andre Brown Nelson v. Edward W. Murray, Director

Fourth Circuit

Andre Brown Nelson v. Edward W. Murray, Director

74 F.3d 1232, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38863, 1996 WL 23176

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 23, 1996

Docket95-7034

StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1232 (Andre Brown Nelson v. Edward W. Murray, Director) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andre Brown Nelson v. Edward W. Murray, Director, 74 F.3d 1232, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38863, 1996 WL 23176 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

74 F.3d 1232
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Andre Brown NELSON, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Respondent--Appellee.

No. 95-7034.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 23, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-94-398)

Andre Brown Nelson, Appellant Pro Se.

Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Nelson v. Murray, No. CA-94-398 (E.D. Va. June 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

74 F.3d 1232
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Andre Brown NELSON, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director, Respondent--Appellee.

No. 95-7034.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 23, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-94-398)

Andre Brown Nelson, Appellant Pro Se.

Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Nelson v. Murray, No. CA-94-398 (E.D. Va. June 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 F.3d 1232, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38863, 1996 WL 23176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andre-brown-nelson-v-edward-w-murray-director-ca4-1996.