Andre Brigham Young v. Mark Seling, Superintendent of the Special Commitment Center

Ninth Circuit

Andre Brigham Young v. Mark Seling, Superintendent of the Special Commitment Center

248 F.3d 1197, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3636, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 4442, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 8695, 2001 WL 476876

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 8, 2001·No. 98-35377·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pursuant to Seling v. Young, 531 U.S. 250, 121 S.Ct. 727, 148 L.Ed.2d 734 (2001), this matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in this case. Additionally, because we remand this matter to the district court, appellant’s motion for “proceedings consistent with the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court,” which was filed with this court, is denied without prejudice. Appellant may renew his motion in the district court following remand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pursuant to Seling v. Young, 531 U.S. 250, 121 S.Ct. 727, 148 L.Ed.2d 734 (2001), this matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in this case. Additionally, because we remand this matter to the district court, appellant’s motion for “proceedings consistent with the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court,” which was filed with this court, is denied without prejudice. Appellant may renew his motion in the district court following remand.

Andre Brigham Young v. Mark Seling, Superintendent of the Special Commitment Center, 248 F.3d 1197, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3636, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 4442, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 8695, 2001 WL 476876 (9th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

248 F.3d 1197 (Andre Brigham Young v. Mark Seling, Superintendent of the Special Commitment Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related