Andrade v. Gonzales

187 F. App'x 790
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 3, 2006·No. No. 05-76921·Published

Opinions

ORDER

We have reviewed the record and the opposition to the motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction. We conclude that petitioner has failed to raise a colorable constitutional claim to invoke our jurisdiction over this petition. See Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001). Accordingly, respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002).

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrade v. Gonzales, 187 F. App'x 790 (9th Cir. 2006).

187 F. App'x 790 (Andrade v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related