Andover Savings Bank v. Adams
This text of 83 Mass. 28 (Andover Savings Bank v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is not- distinguishable from Sparhawk v. Wills, 6 Gray, 163. The promises to pay the debt at one time and the interest at another are several, and afford distinct causes of action. Such was clearly the intention of the parties. It was the ordinary case where a note is given for a time certain, but it was not supposed that the principal would be paid at its maturity. It was doubtless intended that the debt should remain for a longer period, the interest being paid semiannually. Judgment for the plaintiffs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 Mass. 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andover-savings-bank-v-adams-mass-1861.