Andir v. Shinseki
This text of Andir v. Shinseki (Andir v. Shinseki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 13-7137 Document: 3 Page: 1 Filed: 10/30/2013
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
BASILIO R. ANDIR, Claimant-Appellant,
v.
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. ______________________
2013-7137 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 10-2166, Judge William P. Greene, Jr. ______________________
PER CURIAM. ORDER This court considers whether Basilio Andir’s notice of appeal is untimely. The United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) received Andir’s notice of appeal on August 19, 2013. Judgment was entered by the Veterans Court on April 2, 2012. As such, a total of 503 days had elapsed between judgment and receipt of the appeal. Case: 13-7137 Document: 3 Page: 2 Filed: 10/30/2013
A notice of appeal of a decision of the Veterans Court must be filed within 60 days after that court’s entry of judgment. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2107. Thus, it appears that this appeal is untimely. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) Andir is directed to show cause, within 30 days of the date of filing of this order, as to why his appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. The Secretary may also respond by that date. (2) The briefing schedule is stayed. FOR THE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk s25
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Andir v. Shinseki, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andir-v-shinseki-cafc-2013.