Andiloro v. Lefkowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Andiloro v. Lefkowitz

43 A.D.2d 967, 352 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5694

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 19, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 43 A.D.2d 967 (Andiloro v. Lefkowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andiloro v. Lefkowitz, 43 A.D.2d 967, 352 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5694 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant Lefkowitz appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, RocHand County, dated nunc pro tune March 21, 1973, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint as to him. The notice of appeal is hereby amended to indicate that the appeal is from said order. The title of the case was amended by stipulation to name Michael P. Lefkowitz as [968]*968a defendant in place of Paul Lefkowitz. Order reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Service of process on defendant Lefkowitz was not made prior to the running of the 'Statute of Limitations (1 Weinstein-Kom-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 305.16). Shapiro, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant Lefkowitz appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, RocHand County, dated nunc pro tune March 21, 1973, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint as to him. The notice of appeal is hereby amended to indicate that the appeal is from said order. The title of the case was amended by stipulation to name Michael P. Lefkowitz as [968]*968a defendant in place of Paul Lefkowitz. Order reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Service of process on defendant Lefkowitz was not made prior to the running of the 'Statute of Limitations (1 Weinstein-Kom-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 305.16). Shapiro, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.2d 967, 352 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andiloro-v-lefkowitz-nyappdiv-1974.