Andika, Eric AKA Eric Gachucha Andika

Opinion

;€_gw- U_/exlh(

end/mg @1@1¢>~: §§ Q~uwW %\>ec r+ 04 L~>¢\s~ NL>* 1102 gaglzg~,¢_oz,.¢>be% \`*/\ v

\é>v-@\)W

wb\ |%/’H_() `OU

if @“§\\<¢ » '

:H: mcclsz 3

jj7 FM 294/97 l,_)oz>&r'¢ ll{/T\¢"TS<_?°H>

M§~¥e~¢> b\»~LQ'JD (®'L”) UH.UL

RECE|VED lN COURT OF CR|MINAL APPEALS

DEC 07 2015

Abe| Acosta, C|erk

_.,.§4 '4]. se vva ., RE= -='su'xi§Pr-.ém'fhr; ARédnENT-iii ..supéea'r QF err No.' vm-M,,a?e-'os

,,:r§) gsa HoNORABLE JUDGES §_F'_ ives mr o'F cRI~MINAL APPEALS: ` - _' 1 4 b `. ""'?""‘ §

NOW COMES ERIC ANDIKA, Petitioner in the above writ number that-"s pending in

;.'.

l{, x,.

plea that was taken on the wm c£u$a; maher was hot voluntary since

'~ that the thi`r6 degree offehse woh]d be ehhahce6 to 25 to life aa:"» the inltial indictme;i og$\&eetes'and '_as several cases have indicated,

the basis af enterin

madvertently, the Judiclal system would have failed to perfornt its l . duty ‘I'ellez v. State, 522 S._w. 26 506 (M Cr. 4A99. 1975)

'~j~

' 2) The` entire process lea6ing to the,'591ea of guilt and the xndmctment are »defective. l

UEREME 223414$28 COI\BIDERED, movant prays that the court will see,..it fit to '

dismiss the entire caee. 4

' 5 ~ cERTIFrcATE op saavlcz

d I her§;y certify that a copy of thisv Supplemsntal Atgun_\ent in _Support of § the pending unfit before the Gourt has been mailed to thdilprosecution in Wichita v z Fall's, 'I_‘exas `on_ the let of Decembe_t, 2915

` s‘jj£cérélg submictc-¥d.'