Anderten

Court of Claims

Anderten

153 Ct. Cl. 696, 1961 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 100, 1961 WL 1555

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedMay 12, 1961

DocketNo. 452-58

StatusPublished

This text of 153 Ct. Cl. 696 (Anderten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderten, 153 Ct. Cl. 696, 1961 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 100, 1961 WL 1555 (cc 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Military pay; active duty pay; Court of Claims — jurisdiction ; courts-martial — review of. — Plaintiff, a former officer of the United States Air Force, sues to recover active duty pay on the ground that his dismissal from the Air Force following a sentence by court-martial, was illegal and null and void. The case came before the court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition. Upon consideration thereof, together with oral arguments by the parties, and on the basis of this court’s decisions in Begalke v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 397, cert. denied 364 U.S. 865, and Narum v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 312, cert. denied 368 U.S. 848, the court, on May 12, 1961, denied plaintiff’s motion and granted defendant’s motion, and the petition was dismissed. Plaintiff’s motion for rehearing was denied July 19, 1961, and petition for writ of certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court, 368 U.S. 1004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Military pay; active duty pay; Court of Claims — jurisdiction ; courts-martial — review of. — Plaintiff, a former officer of the United States Air Force, sues to recover active duty pay on the ground that his dismissal from the Air Force following a sentence by court-martial, was illegal and null and void. The case came before the court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition. Upon consideration thereof, together with oral arguments by the parties, and on the basis of this court’s decisions in Begalke v. United States, 148 Ct. Cl. 397, cert. denied 364 U.S. 865, and Narum v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 312, cert. denied 368 U.S. 848, the court, on May 12, 1961, denied plaintiff’s motion and granted defendant’s motion, and the petition was dismissed. Plaintiff’s motion for rehearing was denied July 19, 1961, and petition for writ of certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court, 368 U.S. 1004.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

153 Ct. Cl. 696, 1961 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 100, 1961 WL 1555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderten-cc-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack